As an extension task I have written my response on a documentary called the 'Watching', which explores the opening title sequences to films.
When Thomas Sutcliffe says “Films
need to seduce their audience into long term commitment. While there
are many types of seduction, the temptation to go for instant arousal is
almost irresistible” he means that the instant the film starts it has to grab the audience ‘seduce them’ because it will be ‘the start of the
ride’ and they need to want to say for the ride in this case the
duration of the film. So the first impression means everything. He is
basically saying that with any film to work, within the first 5 minutes
the audience needs to be grabbed in ‘seduced’ or they won’t like it like
because the film will no longer appeal to them. But if the opening of
the film is good no one can deny it because it would be visible for
people to see and make people want to stay for the rest of the ride/film
and see how it plays out ‘it would be almost irresistible’.
Thomas
Sutcliffe is suggesting that the film director should seduce the
audience into a long term commitment by creating a unique beginning to a
film opening that will then grab the attention of most viewers and will
encourage them to want to watch the rest of the film. He is also saying the typical
film openings to the films now are not standing out and the audience are
demanding something more creative and unique which creates suspense/tension to
the openings.
According
to Director Jean Jacques Beineix the risks of ‘instant arousal’ is that
the audience come into watching the film expecting something to happen
and if it doesn’t happen within the next 20 minutes they’re gone. He
says people have to accept to wait and let the story/film grow and then
something will happen. So he lets the film/story build up because he
says that after a strong start people ask questions “what will happen
next?”, and then the director and crew have to answer the questions, but
they take a risk never to answer the question.
“A
good film beginning must make the audience feel that it doesn’t know
nearly enough yet, and at the same time make sure that it doesn’t know
too little” This is because it is like the rules of engagement to make
sure the audience is giving their full attention. So this wakes the
audience and instructs them on how they should be watching the film and
how’ll they be while watching the film. Making sure they get their
moneys worth. This is done by making the being crucial, so the film is
established and they have an early adjustment to the genre of the film
and establishing many things at once.
Critic
Stanley Kauffmann describes the classic opening as it starting of with
an establishing shot (seen from the east), a close up of a building, the
camera going up a building to a window, then the camera goes into the window, then goes past the receptionist
just to a private office and there would be a person. The classic
opening worked because it showed were the thing is taking place, what
the occupation the person is in and most importantly the organization of
the world.
Kyle
Cooper’s title sequence to the film Seven is so effective because the
sequence tuned the viewers because it set the genre of the film and
settled the viewers into their seats because it was part of the
transition and it gets them right on the head, waking them up so they
could get ready for what was going to happen next. So the sequence
became a scene of the film and introduced the obsessive story of the main character.
Orson
Welles wanted to achieve having the audience plunged into the story of
the film with out giving them time to prepare them selves so he deiced
the opening of the film would been seen with out credits
and with out title music in the opening to the film ‘A Touch of Evil?’
because an opening of a film should lead the audience into the
film/story, letting the know slowly. Telling the audience the nature and
the kind of story the film is by introducing some important characters
or characters that will become important. But the studio wanted it there
so they put a score, source and credits underneath the opening. So the
effect that Welles wanted to achieve was lost.
“A
favorite trick of Film Noir” is a thing directors like to do in a film
were the beginning of the film starts with the ending of the story. This
is a trick because it should be the other way round. So the beginning
of the film feels like a destination point, unlike a departure point
looking ahead of what to come and anything that the audience doesn’t see
the first time they will see once they see it again (foreshadowing what is to come).
The
opening of the film The Shining creates suspense because the way camera
techniques and the music are used during the opening. First you can see
an easy up lift of a helicopter shot and the second viewing you can see
the camera pursuing the car like a predator high up and from behind but
at the same time see the surrounding/setting. Letting the audience just
guess them selves that the people are travelling in the wrong
direction.
No comments:
Post a Comment